Grant Analysis Report

Powered by GrantArchive

Detailed Analysis

Overall
65
C
SEO
70
25%
Performance
65
25%
Mobile
75
15%
Security
80
20%
seo
70
performance
65
mobile
75
security
80

SEO Analysis

Title Tag

Length: 34 characters (Optimal: 40-60)

Meta Description

Length: 160 characters (Optimal: 120-160)

H1 Headings

Found: 1 H1 tag

Heading Hierarchy

H1: 1, H2: 2, H3: 3

PageSpeed Insights (Placeholder)

Desktop Score 71
Mobile Score 77

* Placeholder data. Integrate PageSpeed Insights API for real metrics.

Meta Tags Analysis

Tag Status Details
TitleGood34 chars
DescriptionGood160 chars
H1Present1 found
H2-H6Present7 headings

Image Analysis

Alt Tags
Missing: 0 / Total: 0
File Sizes
Optimized: Yes
WebP Usage
Enabled
Lazy Loading
Implemented

Link Analysis

5
Total Links
1
Internal
4
External
0
Broken
Note: Broken link checking requires external API integration

Mobile-Friendliness

Viewport Set

Width=device-width, initial-scale=1

Mobile Friendly

Page passes mobile-friendly test

Tap Targets

Adequate spacing between links

Font Size

Readable without zooming

SSL/TLS Certificate

Status
Valid
Issuer
Let's Encrypt
Grade
A+

Security Headers

Header Status Grade
HSTSPresentA
CSPPresentA
X-Frame-OptionsPresentA
X-Content-TypePresentA
Referrer-PolicyPresentA
Permissions-PolicyMissingC

Technology Stack

CMS/Framework
Symfony
Server
Nginx
PHP Version
8.3
Database
PostgreSQL

DNS Records (Placeholder)

A Record
172.16.0.1
MX
mail.example.com
NS
ns1.example.com

* DNS data requires external API integration

WHOIS Data (Placeholder)

Registrar
Example Registrar
Registration Date
2020-01-01
Expiry Date
2027-01-01
Days Until Expiry
365

* WHOIS data requires external API integration

Core Web Vitals

LCP
2450ms
Needs Improvement
FID/INP
50ms
Good
CLS
0.000
Good
FCP
1904ms
Good

* Placeholder values. Integrate PageSpeed Insights API for real Core Web Vitals data.

How GrantArchive Scoring Works

1. Data Analysis

We analyze grant data directly from Grants.gov including funding amounts, eligibility, and historical patterns.

2. Score Calculation

Our algorithm scores each grant on funding potential, urgency, competition level, and match quality.

3. Get Notified

Set up alerts to never miss a deadline and receive personalized recommendations.

Advertisement
Open · 162 days left D U.S. National Science Foundation

Perception, Action & Cognition

Funding
$7.3M
Expected Awards
35
Deadline
--
Days
--
Hrs
--
Min
--
Sec
Aug 03, 2026
Posted Mar 6, 2009 (6196 days ago)
Closes Aug 3, 2026 (in 162 days)

Grant Details

Opportunity Number
PD-09-7252
CFDA / ALN
47.075
Opportunity Category
Discretionary (D)
Funding Category
Science and Technology (ST)
Funding Instrument
Grant (G)
Cost Sharing
No Cost Sharing (No)

Eligibility

Unrestricted (99)

Description

The aim of the PAC program is to support empirically grounded, theoretically engaged and methodologically sophisticated research in a wide range of topic areas related to human perceptual, motor, and cognitive processes and their interactions. The PAC program welcomes a wide range of perspectives and a variety of methodologies (including computational modeling if the goal is to expand explanatory theories of human perception, action, or cognition). PAC strongly encourages proposals that examine human behavior in realistic (or real-world) scenarios and that include varied subject population. It is expected that knowledge gained from PAC-supported projects will have a clear and direct path towards benefitting society. PAC is open to co-review of proposals submitted to other programs both within the Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences Directorate and across other directorates. Note: Proposals may be returned without review if the primary goal of the research is to understand (1) structure/function mappings between PAC processes and neural activity; (2) clinical populations per se; or (3) behavior of non-human animals without a clear and direct impact on our understanding of human perception, action or cognition. Before submitting a proposal, investigators are encouraged to email [email protected] with a one-page summary of the proposed research (modeled after the Project Summary page of a standard proposal and including a description of both Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts) in order to confirm appropriateness of the work for the PAC program. PIs are strongly encouraged to submit the Single Copy Document titled “List of Suggested Reviewers” with their full proposal. Sharing of data and other materials is an expectation for funded research. Please consult the NSFDear Colleague Letter: Effective Practices for Data for more details. Interested in talking with a program director? Send a one-page description of the proposed research to [email protected].
Loading…
Loading the web debug toolbar…
Attempt #